Volume Issue Year Page No Type PDF Download
58 2 2026 186 - 193 Research article
Effect of rice residue and nitrogen management on weeds and productivity of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)
Poonam, Harmeet Singh, Simerjeet Kaur, Jagroop Kaur and S.S. Manhas
DOI :
Email : simer@pau.edu
Address : Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India

Keywords

Happy seeder, Nitrogen management, Surface seeding-cum-mulching, Weed management  

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter (Rabi) seasons of 2023-24 and 2024-25 at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, to evaluate the effects of rice residue and nitrogen management on weeds in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) of rice (Oryza sativa L.)- should be in the middle oilseed rape rotation. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with three replications. Main plot treatments included three rice residue management practices involving oilseed rape seeding with Happy seeder (Happy seeder), surface seeding-cum-mulching, and conventional method while the sub-plot treatments comprised of three nitrogen levels, viz. 75%, 100% and 125% of the recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN). Among the rice residue management practices, both the surface seeding-cum-mulching and Happy seeder method recorded significantly lower weed density and biomass compared to the conventional method at 30 days after sowing (DAS). Application of 75% RDN resulted in significantly lower weed density and biomass at 30 DAS compared with 100% and 125% RDN. Further, application of 125% RDN increased seed yield by 19.6% over 75% RDN, whereas 100% RDN produced a 15.3% higher yield than 75% RDN. The highest weed density and biomass were observed with the conventional method, indicating that residue retention practices using Happy seeder and surface seeding-cum-mulching methods, combined with 75%  nitrogen dose were more effective in suppressing weed emergence and growth in oilseed rape based on the two-year pooled analysis. Happy seeder-sown oilseed rape produced 10.4% and 23.3% higher seed yield than conventional method and surface seeding-cum-mulching, respectively.

Full Article PDF Viewer