This article Citation:

Rajkaran Singh, Simerjeet Kaur1, Lovreet Singh Shergill, Tarundeep Kaur and Gurpreet Singh. 2025. Seed-shattering phenology of Phalaris minor and Avena ludoviciana at wheat harvest in north-western India . Indian Journal of Weed Science : 57( ) 172- 176.







Editorial office:

Office Manager
Indian Society of Weed Science
ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research,
Maharajpur, Jabalpur, India 482 004
+91 9300127442 | iswsjbp@gmail.com

Publisher Address:

Secretary
Indian Society of Weed Science
ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research,
Maharajpur, Jabalpur, India 482 004
+91 9425412041 | dubeyrp@gmail.com

Volume Issue Publication year Page No Type of article
57 2025 172-176 Research article
Seed-shattering phenology of Phalaris minor and Avena ludoviciana at wheat harvest in north-western India

Rajkaran Singh, Simerjeet Kaur1, Lovreet Singh Shergill, Tarundeep Kaur and Gurpreet Singh

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2025.00029.5

Email: simer@pau.edu
Address: Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141004, India

Keywords:

Avena ludoviciana, Harvest weed seed control, Phalaris minor, Plant height, Seed retention, Weed control



Abstract:

Weed infestations are primarily driven by the weed seedbank, making it essential to reduce seedbank replenishment for effective control. Seed shattering or retention is a weed plant-specific characteristics and can vary for different weed species, their cohorts or biotypes/populations and weather conditions. Seed shattering phenology of Phalaris minor and Avena ludoviciana and possible drivers (such as total number of seeds per panicle, plant height, number of tillers and plant biomass) for seed retention was studied at wheat harvest in a two-year study at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. The results suggested that 74% and 9% seed retention of P. minor and A. ludoviciana, respectively at wheat harvest. The plant biomass played a critical role in seed retention for P. minor, while none of the tested predictors significantly influenced retention in A. ludoviciana. This highlighted the weed species-specific differences in seed retention mechanisms, which could be essential for understanding their ecological and management implications. It is concluded that P. minor may be a suitable candidate (with 74% seed retention) for harvest weed seed control (HWSC) approaches while A. ludoviciana (with 9% seed retention) cannot be targeted with this approach.

 





Indexing Indexing & Abstracting Services