Mega business
  • Home
  • About ISWS
    • About Society
    • President's Message
    • Executive Board
    • Constitution
    • Weed Information
    • Other Important Links
    • Downloads
  • Publications
    • Indian Journal of Weed Science
    • IJWS MS online submission
    • Publications login
    • Conference Proceedings
    • Meeting Proceedings
    • ISWS Newsletters
    • Weed News
  • Membership
    • Join ISWS Online
    • Directory ISWS
    • Update ISWS Directory
  • Award
  • Contact Us
    • Contact Us
    • Directory ISWS
  • Member Login
Home IJWS
Submit Your Paper
Guide for Authors
Peer Review Policy
View Editorial Board
Abstracting/ Indexing
Current Issue
All Issue

All issues

Volume - 52(2020)
Issue-1
Issue-2
Issue-3
Issue-4
Volume - 51(2019)
Issue-1
Issue-2
Issue-3
Issue-4
Volume - 50(2018)
Issue-1
Issue-2
Issue-3
Issue-4
Volume - 49(2017)
Issue-1
Issue-2
Issue-3
Issue-4
Volume - 48(2016)
Issue-1
Issue-2
Issue-3
Issue-4
Volume - 47(2015)
Issue-1
Issue-2
Issue-3
Issue-4
Volume - 46(2014)
Issue-1
Issue-2
Issue-3
Issue-4
Volume - 45(2013)
Issue-1
Issue-2
Issue-3
Issue-4
Volume - 44(2012)
Issue-1
Issue-2
Issue-3
Issue-4
Volume - 43(2011)
Issue-1&2
Issue-3&4
Volume - 42(2010)
Issue-1&2
Issue-1&2 Supplymentary
Issue-3&4
Volume - 41(2009)
Issue-1&2
Issue-3&4
Issue-1&2 Supplymentary
Issue-3&4 Supplymentary
Volume - 40(2008)
Issue-1&2
Issue-3&4
Issue-1&2 Supplymentary
Issue-3&4 Supplymentary
Volume - 39(2007)
Issue-1&2
Volume - 38(2006)
Issue-1&2
Volume - 37(2005)
Issue-1&2
Issue-3&4
Volume - 36(2004)
Issue-1&2
Issue-3&4
Volume - 1(1969)
Issue-1&2
Issue-3&4

Indian Journal of Weed Science


Print ISSN: 0253-8050
Online ISSN: 0974-8164

NAAS rating: 5.17

Chief Editor

J.S. Mishra
Dr. J.S. Mishra
Principal Scientist, Division of Crop Research,
ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region,
Bihar Veterinary College, Patna - 800014 (Bihar)
Mobile - +91 9494240904
Email- editorisws@gmail, jsmishra31@gmail.com

Associate editors

Bhagirath S. Chauhan

Dr. Bhagirath Singh Chauhan
Queensland Alliance for Agricultureand Food Innovation
Level 2, Queensland Bioscience Precinct
The University of Queensland
St Lucia QLD 4069, Australia
Email: b.chauhan@uq.edu.au
A.N. Rao
Dr. A.N. Rao
Hydarabad, INDIA
Mobile Number: +91 9440372165
Email: adusumilli.narayanarao@gmail.com

CALL FOR RESEARCH PAPER

Indian Journal of Weed Science is inviting your articles, review article, Research article and Research note on all topics of weed science. IJWS welcomes quality work that focuses on research, development and review. We are looking forward for strict compliance to the modern age standards in all these fields. Authors across the globe are welcome to submit their research papers in the prestigious journal fulfilling the requisite criterion.

Indian Journal of Weed Science (IJWS) is inviting papers for the VOL-53, ISSUE-1 March-(2021)


Article submission guideline

Enter your login details for IJWS below. If you do not already have an account you will need to.. Register here
Author login
  • Author Instruction
  • Style of Invited paper
  • Style of Research Article
  • Style of Research note

Paper Publication Process –

  • Manuscripts are received online in the editorial office with the certificate that MS has not been sent for consideration in any other journals for consideration.
  • Manuscripts are checked by office for its style and pattern and for plagiarism. If plagiarism is more than 20%, it is not considered and sent back to author for revision and re-submission.
  • If MS is found fit at Editorial office in context to plagiarism and style and pattern, it is sent to Chief Editor for further processing.
  • If chief Editor find the MS suitable for consideration, he shall suggest two name of referees as reviewers either from editorial board or from other institutions of concern discipline for reviewing the MS.
  • Editorial Office shall send the MS for double blind review to the reviewers suggested by Chief Editor.
  • Comments of double -blind reviewers will be sent to corresponding author without disclosing the identity of the reviewers to address the comments and re-submission of MS.
  • In case, one reviewer rejects while other accept the MS, it is sent to third reviewer suggested by Chief Editor.
  • Revised MS is again sent to reviewers to see whether their comments are addressed suitably.
  • On agreeing by the reviewers, the MS is again sent to Chief Editors with comments of reviewers and reply of author to take the final decision.
  • The final decision of Chief Editor is communicated to authors.

CALL FOR RESEARCH PAPER

Indian Journal of Weed Science is inviting your articles, review article, Research article and Research note on all topics of weed science. IJWS welcomes quality work that focuses on research, development and review. We are looking forward for strict compliance to the modern age standards in all these fields. Authors across the globe are welcome to submit their research papers in the prestigious journal fulfilling the requisite criterion.

Indian Journal of Weed Science (IJWS) is inviting papers for the VOL-51, ISSUE-4 December-(2019)


Article submission guideline

Enter your login details for IJWS below. If you do not already have an account you will need to.. Register here
Author login
  • Author Instruction
  • Style of Invited paper
  • Style of Research Article
  • Style of Research note

Paper Publication Process –

  • Manuscripts are received online in the editorial office with the certificate that MS has not been sent for consideration in any other journals for consideration.
  • Manuscripts are checked by office for its style and pattern and for plagiarism. If plagiarism is more than 20%, it is not considered and sent back to author for revision and re-submission.
  • If MS is found fit at Editorial office in context to plagiarism and style and pattern, it is sent to Chief Editor for further processing.
  • If chief Editor find the MS suitable for consideration, he shall suggest two name of referees as reviewers either from editorial board or from other institutions of concern discipline for reviewing the MS.
  • Editorial Office shall send the MS for double blind review to the reviewers suggested by Chief Editor.
  • Comments of double -blind reviewers will be sent to corresponding author without disclosing the identity of the reviewers to address the comments and re-submission of MS.
  • In case, one reviewer rejects while other accept the MS, it is sent to third reviewer suggested by Chief Editor.
  • Revised MS is again sent to reviewers to see whether their comments are addressed suitably.
  • On agreeing by the reviewers, the MS is again sent to Chief Editors with comments of reviewers and reply of author to take the final decision.
  • The final decision of Chief Editor is communicated to authors.
Read More

Guidelines for Authors

Indian Journal of Weed Science is a quarterly journal publishing original research article, research notes, opinion articles and review articles (invited or with prior approval of the title reflecting substantial contributions of the author) covering all areas of weed science research. All contributions must be of a sufficient quality to extend our knowledge in weed science.

The papers submitted should not have been published or communicated elsewhere. Authors will be solely responsible for the factual accuracy of their contribution. Manuscript should not carry any material already published in the same or different forms.

  • Style of Invited paper
  • Style of Research Article
  • Style of Research note

Format

Full length article should be suitably divided into the following sub-sections; ABSTRACT, Key words, INTRODUCTION, MATERIALS AND METHODS, RESULTS AND DISCUSSION and REFERENCES. The heading, introduction need not be mentioned in the text.

Title

The title of article should be informative but concise and should not contain abbreviations. It should indicate the content of the article essential for key word indexing and information retrieval. It should be set in small and bold letters. A good title briefly identifies the subject, indicates the purpose of study and introduces key terms and concepts. Title should not be started with the waste words like 'a study of', 'effect of', 'influence of' , 'some observations on', 'a note of' etc. The title should indicate preferably English name or most popular common name of the crops or organisms studied, wherever relevant. Scientific name can be given in abstract and introduction. Authority for such a name should be given at first mention in the text. A short title should be given for running headlines and should cover the main theme of the article.

Author(s) name(s) and affiliations

The name(s) of the author(s) should be given in small letters with sentence case separated by 'comma' or by 'and'. Institute name where the research was carried out should be given in italics. If authors are of different institutes, these can be mentioned by allotting number like 1, 2 or 3 as superscript over the name of author. The affiliation of such author may be given below of the corresponding author email address. Sometimes authors retire and change frequently and wish to give their current address, this should be given as foot note. Email address of main author or corresponding author should be given at the bottom.

Abstract

The abstract should contain at least one sentence on each of the following: objective of investigation (hypothesis, purpose, collection, result and conclusions). Give complete scientific name for plants or other organisms and full name of any symbol or abbreviations used. There is a need to mention place, name and priod of study in abstract. Emphasis should be given to highlight the results and the conclusion of the study. It should not exceed a total length of 200-250 words. Abstract should not have the words like 'will be explained or will be discussed'.

Key words

(5 6) should be given at the end of the abstract and should be arranged alphabetically. Each key word should be started with capital letter and separated by comma ( , ) from other words.

Introduction

Introduction should be brief and to the point, cover the problem and should justify the work or the hypothesis on which it is based. In introduction, a detail review is not necessary. However, to orient readers, important references about previous concepts and research should be given. It should briefly state the currently available information and should identify the research gap that is expected to be abridged through this investigation. Give preference to recent references from standard research publication unless it is of historical importance or a landmark in that field.

Materials and Methods

This part should begin with information relating to period/season/year and place of study, climate or weather conditions, soil type etc. Treatment details along with techniques and experimental design, replications, plot size etc. should be clearly indicated. Use of symbols for treatments may be avoided and an abbreviation should be fully explained at its first mention. Crop variety, methodology for application and common cultivation practices should be mentioned. Known methods may be just indicated giving reference but new techniques developed and followed should be described in detail. Methods can be divided into suitable sub-headings, typed in bold at first level and in italics at second level, if necessary.

Results and Discussion

Results may be reported and discussed together to avoid duplication. Do not mention and recite the data in the text as such given in the table. Instead interpret it suitably by indicating in terms of per cent, absolute change or any other derivations. Relate results to the objectives with suitable interpretation of the references given in the introduction. If results differ from the previous study, suitable interpretation and justification should be given. Repeated use of statements like 'our results are in agreement’ or ‘similar results were reported’ 'should be avoided. At the end of results and discussion, conclusion of the study should be given in 2-3 sentences along with suggestion for further study, if any. All statistical comparisons among treatments may be made at P=0.05 level of probability.

Acknowledgement

The authors may place on record the help and cooperation or any financial help received from any source, person or organization for this study. This should be very brief.

References

Only relevant and recent references of standard work should be quoted. Preference should be given to quote references of journals over proceedings or reports. In general, not more than 15 references should be quoted in full paper and 5 in short communication. However, in review article, emphasis should be given to quote more references with each valid statement/findings in the text. There is no need to give references for standard procedures of soil and plant analysis, and for routine statistical analysis in practice, only the methodology may be indicated. As a thumb rule, all the references quoted in the text must appear at the end of the article and vice-verse. It has been decided to use full name of the journal after the year 2011 onwards. Therefore, references should include names of all authors, year, full title of the article quoted, full name of the journal in italics (no abbreviations), volume number (in Bold), issue number (in brackets) and pages. For books, monographs, theses etc. full title in italics, publisher or university name, volume no., if any, and relevant page range or total no. of pages should be given. The list of references should be arranged alphabetically on author's names and chronologically per author. Author name should be started with surname and initial letter with capital letter. There is no need to separate author's initials by full stop but it should be given in capital letters without gap. Each author name should be separated by comma (,) and last author name by ‘and’. A few examples of correct citation of references for Indian Journal of Weed Science are given below:

Singh Samunder, Punia SS, Yadav A and Hooda VS. 2011. Evaluation of carfentrazone-ethyl + metsulfuron-methyl against broadleaf weeds of wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science 43(1&2): 12-22.

Neeser C and Varshney Jay G. 2001. Purple nutsedge; biology and principles for management without herbicides, Indian Journal of Pulses Research 14(1): 10-19.

Naseema A, Praveena R and Salim AM. 2004. Ecofriendly management of water hyacinth with a mycoherbicide and cashew nut shell liquid. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 10(1&2): 93-100.

Arya DR, Kapoor RD and Dhirajpant. 2008. Herbicide tolerant crops: a boon to Indian agriculture, pp 23-31. In: Biennial Conference on Weed Management in Modern Agriculture: Emerging Challenges and Opportunities. (Eds. Sharma RS, Sushilkumar, Mishra JS, Barman KK and Sondhia Shobha), 27-28 February 2008, Patna. Indian Society of Weed Science, Jabalpur.

Anonymous. 2006. Long-term herbicide trial in transplanted lowland rice-rice cropping system, pp 62-68. In: Annual Progress Report, AICRP on Weed Control, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.

DWSR. 2010. Annual Report, 2010-11, pp 35-37. Directorate of Weed Science Research, Jabalpur.

Gopal B and Sharma KP. 1981. Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) the most troublesome weeds of the world. Hindasia Publisher, New Delhi, 129 p.

Sushilkumar, Sondhia S and Vishwakarma K. 2003. Role of insects in suppression of problematic alligator weed (Altemanthera philoxeroides) and testing of herbicides for its integrated management. Final Report of ICAR Adhoc Project, 39 p.

For Web references: the full URL should be given and the date when the reference was last accessed. e.g. http://www.faostat.fao.org (accessed 21 May 2019)

Length

Full length manuscript should not exceed 4500 words including space required for figures, tables and list of references. Research note can be up to 2500 words, with not more than 2 figures or tables. One season/year data should invariably be presented as research notes only.

Units, abbreviations and nomenclature

For physical units, unit names and symbols, the SI system should be employed. Biological names should be given according to the latest international nomenclature. Upon its first use in the title, abstract and text, the common name of a weed should be followed by the scientific name (genus, species and authority) in parentheses. If no common name exists in English, the scientific name should be used only. At the first mention of an herbicide or other chemical substance, give its generic name only. Trade names should not be used. Biological and zoological names, gene designations and gene symbols should be italicized. Yield data should be reported in kg/ha or t/ha. All such letters such as viz., et al., in situ, ex situ, Rabi, Kharif, i.e., etc. should be italicized.

Tables and figures

Tables and figures should be concise and limited to the necessary minimum. We encourage the authors to set tables and figures at the appropriate places in the article but if it is not possible, the same may be given separately. The title should fully describe the contents of the table and explain any symbol or abbreviations used in it. The standard abbreviations of the units of different parameters should be indicated in parentheses. Vertical lines should not be given in the tables and horizontal lines should be used to separate parameters and end of the table.

Figures may be preferred in place of table. In no case the same data should be presented by both tables and figures. While presenting data through line graphs, vertical bars, cylinders, pie charts etc, the same should be preferred with black lines or bars having different clear symbols and shades. The graphs chosen with colours reproduce poorly and should not be given unless it became necessary.

Some useful tips

Avoid numerals and abbreviations at the beginning of a sentence. Don't use superscript for per hectare, ton or meter (kg ha-1 or t ha-1) instead use kg/ha or g/m2, t/ha, mg/g, ml/l etc. Prefer to mention yield data in t/ha only. If it becomes necessary, give yield in kg/ha but not in quintal. Don't use lakh, crores or arabs in text, instead give such figures in million. Only standard abbreviations should be used and invariably be explained at first mention. Avoid use of self-made abbreviations like iso., buta., rizo., etc. Don't use first letter capital for names of plant protection chemicals but it should be used for trade names. Use of treatment symbols like T1 T2 T3 etc. should be avoided. All weights and measurements must be in SI or metric units. Use % after double digit figures, not per cent, for example 10% not 10 per cent. In a series of range of measurement, mention the units only at the end, e.g. 3,4,5 kg/ha instead of 3 kg/ha, 4 kg/ha and 5 kg/ha. Nutrient doses as well as concentration in soil and plant should be given in elemental form only, i.e. P and K should not be given as P2O5 K2O. A variety may be mentioned within single quotes in italic such as 'Pusa Basmai', 'Kufri Sinduri' etc. Statistical data should be given in LSD (P=0.05) instead CD (P=0.05).

Authors are requested to see the recent issue of the journal to prepare the manuscript as per the journal's format.

Manuscript submission

Manuscripts must conform to the journal style (see the latest issue). Correct language is the responsibility of the author. After having received a contribution, there will be a review process, before the Chief Editor makes the definitive decision upon the acceptance for publication. Referee's comments along with editors comments will be communicated to authors as scanned copy/soft copy through email. After revision, author should send back the copy of revised manuscripts to the Chief Editor, ISWS by e-mail only.

Editorial Board reserves the right to suitably modify, accept or reject the MS in view on the reviewer's advice.

We encourage submission of paper only by electronically via E-mail as one complete word document file. When preparing your file, please use only Times New Roman font for text (title 16, all heads 14 and text of 12 point, double spacing with 1.5" margin all the sides) and Symbol font for Greek letters to avoid inadvertent character substitutions.

All manuscripts should be submitted Online (http://www.isws.org.in/login_IJWS.aspx). For authors unable to submit their manuscript online

To see sample copy to prepare the manuscript, please Log on: http://www.isws.org.in/IJWSn/Journal.aspx

Peer Review Policy

All published articles in Indian Journal of Weed Science (IJWS) are subjected to rigorous peer review processes based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by two referees. The ultimate purpose of peer review is to sustain the originality and quality of research work and filtration of poor quality and plagiarized articles. Peer review assures research quality.

Paper Publication Process –

  • Manuscripts are received online in the editorial office with the certificate that MS has not been sent for consideration in any other journals for consideration.
  • Manuscripts are checked by office for its style and pattern and for plagiarism. If plagiarism is more than 20%, it is not considered and sent back to author for revision and re-submission.
  • If MS is found fit at Editorial office in context to plagiarism and style and pattern, it is sent to Chief Editor for further processing.
  • If chief Editor find the MS suitable for consideration, he shall suggest two name of referees as reviewers either from editorial board or from other institutions of concern discipline for reviewing the MS.
  • Editorial Office shall send the MS for double blind review to the reviewers suggested by Chief Editor.
  • Comments of double -blind reviewers will be sent to corresponding author without disclosing the identity of the reviewers to address the comments and re-submission of MS.
  • In case, one reviewer rejects while other accept the MS, it is sent to third reviewer suggested by Chief Editor.
  • Revised MS is again sent to reviewers to see whether their comments are addressed suitably.
  • On agreeing by the reviewers, the MS is again sent to Chief Editors with comments of reviewers and reply of author to take the final decision.
  • The final decision of Chief Editor is communicated to authors.

Peer Review Policy

The practice of peer review is to ensure that only good science is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out by all reputable scientific journals. Our reviewers therefore play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of the (Indian Journal of Weed Science) Journal of Management and Research and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below.

Initial manuscript evaluation

The Editors first evaluate all manuscripts. In some circumstances it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to experts for review.

Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will be informed within 2 weeks of receipt.

Type of Peer Review

The (Indian Journal of Weed Science) employs double blind review, where the reviewer remains anonymous to the authors throughout the process.

How the reviewer is selected

Reviewers are matched to the paper according to their expertise. Our reviewer database contains reviewer contact details together with their subject areas of interest, and this is constantly being updated.

Reviewer reports

Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:

  • Is original
  • Is methodologically sound
  • Follows appropriate ethical guidelines
  • Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions
  • Correctly references previous relevant work

Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process. Reviewers are requested to refrain from giving their personal opinion in the "Reviewer blind comments to Author" section of their review on whether or not the paper should be published. Personal opinions can be expressed in the "Reviewer confidential comments to Editor" section.

How long does the peer review process take?

Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within 2-8 weeks. Should the reviewers' reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed a further expert opinion will be sought. Revised manuscripts are usually returned to the Editors within 3 weeks and the Editors may request further advice from the reviewers at this time. The Editors may request more than one revision of a manuscript.

Final report

A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the reviewers, and may include verbatim comments by the reviewers.
Chief Editor's Decision is final
Reviewers advise the Editors, who are responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.

Special Issues / Conference Proceedings

Special issues and/or conference proceedings may have different peer review procedures involving, for example, Guest Editors, conference organizers or scientific committees. Authors contributing to these projects may receive full details of the peer review process on request from the editorial office.

Becoming a Reviewer for the (Indian Journal of Weed Science)

If you are not currently a reviewer for the (Indian Journal of Weed Science) but would like to be considered as a reviewer for this Journal, please contact the editorial office by e-mail at (editorisws@gmail.com), and provide your contact details. If your request is approved and you are added to the online reviewer database you will receive a confirmatory email, asking you to add details on your field of expertise, in the format of subject classifications.

Editorial Board

Editorial office:

Office Manager, Indian Society of Weed Science, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Maharajpur, Jabalpur, India 482 004

Publisher Address:

Secretary, Indian Society of Weed Science, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Maharajpur, Jabalpur, India 482 004

Principal Scientist
Division of Crop Research
ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region
Bihar Veterinary College, Patna - 800014 (Bihar)

Chief Editor J.S. Mishra 9494240904 jsmishra31@gmail.com

The University of Queensland
St Lucia QLD 4069, Australia

Associate Editor Bhagirath Singh Chauhan b.chauhan@uq.edu.au

Consultant,
ICRISAT,
International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics
Patancheru, Hyderabad

Associate Editor A.N. Rao 9440372165 adusumilli.narayanarao@gmail.com

Editors

Professor,
Department of Agronomy, CCSHAU,
Hisar-125 004 (Haryana)

Ashok Kumar Yadav 9416995523 aky444@gmail.com

Professor & Head,
Division of Agronomy
FoA, Main Campus,
Chatha, SKUAST-Jammu (J&K)

B.C. Sharma 9419152428 drbhagwati@gmail.com

Principal
Vanavarayar Institute of Agriculture
Affiliated to TNAU)
Manakkadavu, Pollachi-642103 (Tamil Nadu)

C. Chinnusamy 9443721575 chinnusamyc@gmail.com

Scientist,
ICAR - Directorate of Weed Research,
Jabalpur (Madhya Padesh)

Dibakar Ghosh 8989190213 dghoshagro@gmail.com

Principal Scientist
Department of Agronomy,
Assam Agricultural University
Jorhat - 785013 (Assam)

I.C. Barua 9435094326 iswar_barua@yahoo.co.in

Principal Scientist
PJTSAU, Hyderabad-30 (Telangana)

M. Madhavi 9491021999 molluru_m@yahoo.com

Assistant Agronomist
Directorate of Agriculture (Govt. of WB)
Kolkata 700001, West Bengal

Malay Kumar Bhowmick 9434239688 bhowmick_malay@rediffmail.com

Associate Professor
(Soil Science & Agrl. Chemistry)
Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College & Research Institute (TNAU),
Trichy (Tamil Nadu)

P. Janaki 9443936160 janakibalamurugan@rediffmail.com

Assistant Chemist (Residue),
Department of Agronomy,
Punjab Agricultural University
Ludhina-141 004 (Punjab)

Pervinder Kaur 9646105418 pervi_7@yahoo.co.in

Sr. Agronomist, Directorate of Extension Education
Punjab Agricultural University
Ludhiana – 141004 (Punjab)

Simerjeet Kaur 9814081108 simer@pau.edu

College of Horticulture,
Vellanikkara. Thrissur – 680 656, (Kerala)

T. Girija 9447004940 girijavijai@gmail.com

Principal Scientist,
Directorate of Maize Research,
Pusa Campus, New Delhi-110012

C.M. Parihar 9013172214 pariharcm@gmail.com

Indexing Indexing & Abstracting Services


1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Volume- 44 | Issue-4 (Oct-Dec) | Year 2012

Sowing time and weed management practices to enhance yield of direct-seeded rice
Jitendra Kumar, Dheer Singh, Brijpal Singh1, Rohitashav Singh, Suman Panwar and Atul Kumar Gupta
Full length articles | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-1 | Volume: 44 Page No:207-209 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

A field experiment was conducted during the Kharif season of 2006 and 2007 at G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar to find out the most effective weed control method under different sowing dates in direct-seeded unpuddled rice. Highest grain yield (2.5-2.7 t/ha) was recorded from 20 June sowing. The grain yield was the highest in mechanical weedings at 20 and 40 DAS. Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha + anilophos 0.4 kg/ha (pre-emergence) produced significantly higher grain yield (3.1-3.3 t/ha) over rest of the herbicidal treatments. Uncontrolled weeds reduced the grain yield of rice by 67-70%.

Email

jitendraagron@yahoo.com

Address

Department of Agronomy, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, U.S Nagar, Uttarakhand 263 145
Effect of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl on yield of transplanted rice
S. Pal, R.K. Ghosh, H. Banerjee, R. Kundu and A. Alipatra
Full length articles | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-2 | Volume: 44 Page No:210-213 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

Efficacy of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl against weeds in transplanted rice was studied during 2008 and 2009 at Regional Research Sub-station, Chakdaha under Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with seven treatments replicated thrice. The major associated weeds were: Echinochloa colona, Cyperus difformis, Ammania baccifera, Ludwigia octovalvis and Monochoria vaginalis. Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl at 42.0 g/ha applied at 3 DAT was most effective in managing associated weed species and yielded maximum grain yield (3.3 t/ha) of rice with lower weed index (10.8%).

Email

hirak.bckv@gmail.com

Address

Department of Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, West Bengal 741 252
Bioefficacy of herbicides in relation to sowing methods in wheat
M.S. Bhullar, Lovreet Singh Shergill, Rupinder Kaur, U.S. Walia and Tarundeep Kaur
Full length articles | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-3 | Volume: 44 Page No:214-217 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

A field experiment was conducted at Ludhiana during 2009-10 and 2010-11, study the effect of sowing methods and herbicides on weed dynamics and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sowing methods, viz. bed planting, zero till, conventional till and stubbled sowing did not influence densities and dry matter accumulation of narrow- and broad-leaved weeds. Averaged over two seasons, bed planting, zero till and conventional till sowing methods recorded similar wheat grain yield and were statistically superior to stubbed sowing. Wheat grain yield under bed planting, zero till and conventional till methods was 25.4, 46.2 and 40.8% higher as compared to stubbled sowing. Among weed control, post-emergence application of carfentrazone + sulfosulfuron 45 g, metsulfuron + sulfosulfuron 30 g and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + metribuzin 275 g/ha recorded complete control of all the narrow- and broad-leaved weeds. Mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron 12 g, sulfosulfuron 25 g, pinoxaden 50 g and clodinafop 60 g/ha recorded effective control of narrow-leaved weeds only. All these herbicidal treatments, except fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + metribuzin 275 g/ha, recorded significantly higher wheat grain yield as compared to unsprayed control. Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + metribuzin was phototoxic to wheat plants and wheat grain yield was at par to weedy check.

Email

bhullarms@pau.edu

Address

Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004
Little seed canary grass resistance to sulfonyl–urea herbicides and its possible management with pendimethalin
Rupa S. Dhawan, Neha Singh and Samunder Singh
Full length articles | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-4 | Volume: 44 Page No:218-224 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

In this study, response of 20 Phalaris minor Retz. (little seed canary grass) populations against sulfosulfuron and its ready–mix formulation sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron and mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron was studied. Out of 20 populations, 12  showed high resistance, 8 showed  medium resitance and none were susceptible to sulfosulfuron (25 g/ha). GR50 value was in the range of 30-110 g/ha in P. minor populations  tested. In wheat, it was more than 200 g/ha. Eleven populations showed resistance to ready mix formulation of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron, 8 populations  were medium R/medium S and one population was susceptible. Similarly, 11 showed resistance to ready mix formulation of mesosulfuron +  iodosulfuron, 7 populations  were medium R/medium S and one biotype was susceptible. GR50 values tested were in the range of 30-110 g/ha in contrast to 5 g/ha at the time of recommendation.

Email

rupadhawan@hotmail.com

Address

Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, CCS HAU Hisar, Haryana 125 004
Combination of pinoxaden with other herbicides against complex weed flora in wheat
Pawan Katara, Suresh Kumar, S.S. Rana and Navell Chander
Full length articles | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-5 | Volume: 44 Page No:225-230 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

A field experiment was conducted during 2010-11 and 2011-12 to evaluate the efficacy of pinoxaden alone and in combination with other herbicides against complex weed flora in wheat. Pinoxaden 50 g/ha alone and as tank mixture with and before metsulfuron-methyl 4 g/ha, carfentrazone-ethyl 20 g/ha and 2,4-D 500 g/ha was compared to isoproturon + 2,4-D, clodinafop fb 2,4-D, weed free and weedy check for weed control and grain yield. Phalaris minor and Anagallis arvensis were the major weeds constituting 59.1 and 20.8% of the total weed population during 2010-11 and 67.6 and 16.9% during 2011-12, respectively. Avena ludovician, Lolium temulentum, Poa annua and Vicia sativa were the other important weeds found in association with wheat. Weeds reduced grain yield of wheat by 39.5%. Pinoxaden + metsulfuron-methyl (50 + 4 g/ha) and pinoxaden fb metsulfuron-methyl (50 fb 4 g/ha) were comparable to weed free treatment in reducing the density of Phalaris minor and Anagallis arvensis. Pinoxaden alone was not effective against broad-leaved weeds, while carfentrazone, metsulfuron-methyl and 2,4-D were not effective against grasses. Combined application of pinoxaden with metsulfuron-methyl/carfentrazone (as tank mixed or as followed by) resulted in significantly lower total weed density and weed biomass. Combined application of pinoxaden with metsulfuron-methyl, carfentrazone and 2,4-D resulted in significantly higher tillers, grains/spike and 1000-seed weight and grain yield as comparable to in weed free.

Email

pawan_katara@ymail.com

Address

Department of Agronomy, Forages and Grassland Management COA, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krish iVishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062
Influence of quizalofop-ethyl on narrow-leaved weeds in blackgram and its residual effect on succeeding crops
S.L. Mundra and P.L. Maliwal
Full length articles | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-6 | Volume: 44 Page No:231-234 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

A field experiment was conducted at Research Farm of MPUAT, Udaipur for two consecutive years during 2008-09 and 2009-10 to evaluate the efficacy of different doses of quizalofop-ethyl as post-emergences (at 4-6 leaf stage of weeds) in blackgram and residual effect thereof on succeeding Rabi crops (wheat, gram and mustard). The experiment comprising five weed control treatments, viz. quizalofop-ethyl at 37.5 and 50 g/ha as post-emergence, pendimethalin 750 g/ha as pre-emergence, farmers practice of two hand weedings at 20 and 35 days after sowing (DAS) and weedy check, was conducted in randomized block design with four replications. To study phytotoxicity, quizalofop-ethyl 100 g/ha was also included in addition to above treatments. In the experimental field, more than 50% weeds were dominated by Echinochloa spp. Results revealed that among the herbicidal treatments, quizalofop-ethyl 50 g/ha recorded the lowest narrow-leaved weed density and dry weight at 30 DAS and at harvest during both the years. Quizalofop-ethyl irrespective of its doses was not effective against broad-leaved weeds. The weed control efficiency of quizalofop-ethyl 50 g/ha was 81.3% than the highest (85.6%) under two hand weedings against grassy weeds at harvest. Number of branches and pods/plant, seeds/pod and grain and stover yields of blackgram were also superior in plots treated with quizalofop-ethyl 50 g/ha or two HW. Quizalofop-ethyl was found safe to blackgram, and did not cause any residual toxicity to succeeding crops.

Email

sampatmundra@yahoo.in

Address

Department of Agronomy, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture & Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313 001
Integrated weed management in sesame
Nisha Bhadauria*, K.S. Yadav, R.L. Rajput and V.B. Singh
Full length articles | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-7 | Volume: 44 Page No:235-237 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

A field experiment was conducted to find out the most effective control measure for weeds in sesame (Sesamum indicun L.) under rainfed condition. Result showed that two hand weeding (weed free) recorded lowest weed population and dry weight which was significantly superior over rest of the treatments. Application of quizalofop-ethy l0.05 kg/ha + 1 HW proved most effective and also recorded lower population and dry weight of weeds followed by trifluralin 0.75 kg/ha + 1 HW and  pendimethalin  0.75 kg/ha + 1 HW. Weed control efficiency and seed yield was higher under quizalofop-ethyl 0.05 kg/ha + 1 hand weeding as compared to other weed control treatments.

Email

bhadauria.snisha2011@gmail.com

Address

College of Agriculture, RVSKVV, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh 474 002
Relative effects of pre-treatment of ethephon, glyphosate and paraquat on glyphosate translocation and potency in control
Dhanraj, S.B. Manjunatha, B. Shwetha and R. Devendra
Full length articles | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-8 | Volume: 44 Page No:238-241 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

Experiments were conducted to standardize duration and level of senescence required to enhance translocation of glyphosate in Cyperus rotundus. Senescence was induced by paraquat (500 g/ha) or glyphosate (1.312 kg/ha). Decrease in total chlorophyll and membrane damage was more in herbicide treatments than ethephon. Periodic leaf RWC remained unchanged in control but decreased periodically in ethephon and paraquat. Significantly higher RWC was observed at 72 h in glyphosate than paraquat. Maintenance of membrane integrity and high RWC in glyphosate at 72 h than paraquat facilitated mobility of glyphosate. Total biomass reduction bioassay indicated that senescence induced by glyphosate (1.312 kg/ha) pre-treatment 48 hr followed by (fb) glyphosate (1.312 kg/ha) showed significantly more  efficacy (7%)  than pre-treatment with benzyl adenine  (synthetic cytokinin) fb glyphosate which reduced  efficacy by 9% compared to glyphosate alone.

Email

devendra.wc.uasb@gmail.com

Address

Department of Crop Physiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka 560 065
Adsorption of oxadiargyl and butachlor on soil particle size separates
P.C. Rao, Ch. S. Rama Lakshmi, M. Madhavi, G. Swapna and A. Sireesha
Full length articles | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-9 | Volume: 44 Page No:242-246 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

Study on adsorption of oxadiargyl and butachlor was carried out on soil particle size separates of four type of soils from different agroclimatic zones of Andhra Pradesh using batch equilibration technique. Irrespective of the particle size, the per cent adsorption was more in vertisols than alfisols. Among four soils studied, maximum adsorption (59.7 µg/g) was observed in 0.05 mm soil separate of vertisol-2, whereas minimum adsorption of 4.5 µg/g was observed in 2 mm soil of alfisol-1. The amount adsorbed increased with increase in initial concentration and reached a plateau. The isotherms were mainly parabolic in nature with ‘S’ shaped tendency. The S-shape reflected the initial resistance to the adsorption of herbicides, to overcome later by the cooperative effect of adsorbed molecules. Soil low to medium in organic carbon, has a tendency to give S-shaped isotherms on account of their hydrophilic nature as compared to soil high in organic carbon which tend to be hydrophobic. The adsorption maxima was positively and significantly correlated with organic carbon content. Freundlich ‘Kf’ values which indicate the extent of binding of herbicide to the soil constituents were positively and significantly correlated with organic carbon, clay content and clay + organic carbon.

Email

sitaramalakshmi20@yahoo.com

Address

College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500 030
Presence of heavy metals in medicinal weed species grown at contaminated sites
P.J. Khankhane, Jay G. Varshney and V.S.G.R. Naidu
Full length articles | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-10 | Volume: 44 Page No:247-250 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

Concentration of heavy metals like Cd, Pb, Ni, Co, Zn, Mn and Fe were tested in medicinal weeds growing at heavy metal contaminated site around Jabalpur during winter season of 2008. Except Vicia  sativa, higher concentration of Cd was observed in weeds like Sonchus arvensis (3.07 µg/g), Alternanthera viridis (1.56 µg/g), Anagalis arvensis (1.5 µg/g), Melilotus indica (1.30 µg/g), Eclipta alba (1.14 µg/g), Chenopodium album (1.15 µg/g), Cichorium intybus (1.05 µg/g), Lathyrus sativa (0.77 µg/g). Copper concentrations in plant was higher than prescribed standard limit, viz. Amaranthus viridis (46 µg/g), Ageratum conyzoides (22 µg/g), Polygonum persicaria (37 µg/g), Commelina communis   (30 µg/g), Alternanthera sessilis (22 µg/g), Solanum nigrum (22 µg/g) and Ipomoea aquatica (21 µg/g) . Ni and Zn contents exceeded the permissible limit in shoots of Polygonum persicaria (19,265 µg/g), Commelina communis (17,192 µg/g), Alternanthera sessilis (14,216 µg/g), Amaranthus viridis (17,488 µg/g), Ipomoea aquatic (15,238 µg/g), Heliotropicum indicum (16,89 µg/g), Ageratum conyzoides (15,127 µg/g),  Blumea lacera (3,218 µg/g), Solanum nigrum (16, 191 µg/g), Convolvulus arvensis ( 15,125 µg/g) and Cyperus iria (15,177 µg/g) respectively. Calotropis procera (21 µg/g) exhibited higher Pb concentration exceeding prescribed standard limit. Conversely, Co content was found within prescribed limit in Melilotus indica, Lathyrus sativa, Heliotropicum indicum, Cyperus iria, Convolvulus arvensis, Blumea lacera, Pb below standard limit in Hyptis suaveolens, Cichorium intybus, Lantana camara and Datura stramonium, and no Pb was detected in Alternanthera sessilis, Abutilon indicum, Xanthium strumarium, Anagalis arvensis.  

Email

pjkhankhane@yahoo.com.ph

Address

Directorate of Weed Science Research, Maharajpur, Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh 482 004
Weed control through smothering crops and use of plant extracts as bioherbicides
D. Nongmaithem, D. Pal and R.K. Ghosh
Full length articles | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-11 | Volume: 44 Page No:251-254 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

A field experiment was conducted at BCKV, Mohanpur during the pre-Kharif season of 2010 and 2011 to observe the weed smothering ability of different crops and also to evaluate the bio-herbicidal potential of plant extracts on weeds. The study revealed that among the crops, significantly lowest population of different categories of weeds were found under black gram while highest population was recorded under sesame. Among the weed management practices, hand weeding at 20 DAS resulted in lowest population of all categories of weeds at 30 DAS. Among the botanical plant extracts, Ageratum conyzoides extract 5% (w/v) recorded lowest sedge and broad-leaved weed population while lowest grassy weed population was recorded under Ocimum sanctum extract 5% (w/v). The highest weed control efficiency was recorded under hand weeding treatment followed by fenoxaprop-p-ethyl while among the botanical plant extract, Ageratum conyzoides recorded the highest.

Email

debikanong@gmail.com

Address

Department of Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal 741 252
Effect of herbicides on weed control and yield of sugarcane
N.F. Almubarak, F.T. Al-Calabi, AlaAl-Janabi and Ishwar Singh
Short communications | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-12 | Volume: 44 Page No:255-258 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

A field experiment was conducted at the research farm of the General Company for industrial crops in the province of Tikrit (Dhuluiya), Iraq to evaluate chemical herbicides, viz. fluazifop-butyl, glyphosate, paraquat and Chevalier in sugarcane variety ‘QD12’. Results showed that use of paraquat helped in controlling weeds to the extent of 86.8% over weedy check. As a result, weed density was very less and reduction in dry weight of green weeds was up to 87.7%. The number of canes increased by 20.5%, green leaves by 56% and leaf area by 45%, which was reflected in the highest increase in cane yield (44.9%). Cane length and diameter were not significantly affected by herbicide application.

Email

nadiralmubarak@yahoo.com

Address

College of Agriculture, University of Diyala, Iraq
Evaluation of post-emergence herbicides in soybean
A.S. Jadhav and G.D. Gadade
Short communications | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-13 | Volume: 44 Page No:259-260 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

A field experiment was carried out at weed science research center, MKV, Parbhani during 2011 and 2012 to evaluate the performance of post emergence herbicides for weed control in soybean  showed that Grain yield as well as straw yield was highest with 2 Hand weeding and hoeing treatments, which was on par with T4 and T1 and significantly higher than rest of the treatments during both the years of experimentation. Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAS significantly reduced weed density and dry weed weight at 30 DAS and 60 DAS respectively over weedy check, and was at par with imazethapyr + imazimox 30 g/ha and imazethapyr 0.1 kg/ha as PoE at 20 DAS.

 

 

Email

asjadhav31@rediffmail.com

Address

Department of Agronomy, Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, Maharashtra 431 402
Bioefficacy of post-emergence herbicides in soybean
V.B. Upadhyay, Vimal Bharti and Anay Rawat
Short communications | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-14 | Volume: 44 Page No:261-263 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

A field experiment was conducted during rainy season of 2009-10 at Research Farm, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur to study the bio-efficacy of post-emergence herbicides on weeds in soybean. Early post-emergence applications of imazethapyr with adjuvant and ammonium sulphate (100 g + 750 ml + 1 kg/ha) was most effective in paralyzing the weed growth and producing significantly higher yield attributing characters and seed yield (2.6 t/ha). The same treatment recorded the maximum net monetary returns ( 39,109/ha) and B:C ratio (3.20). The minimum seed yield (1.3 t/ha) was recorded under weedy check.

Email

rawatanay@rediffmail.com

Address

Department of Agronomy, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 482 004
Weed management in rainy season onion
K.G. Shinde, M.N. Bhalekar and B.T. Patil
Short communications | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-15 | Volume: 44 Page No:264-266 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

A study was undertaken at AICRP (VC), MPKV., Rahuri during Kharif  season of 2011 using different herbicides and their time of application. It was found that the maximum weed control efficiency (87%) was recorded in oxyfluorfen  (425 ml/ha) application before planting and second application at 15 days after transplanting.  For controlling weed flora in Kharif  onion, the oxyflourfen  (625 ml/ha) at 15 days after transplanting and one hand weeding at 45 days after transplanting was found effective followed by oxyflourfen (425 ml/ha) application before planting and second application at 15 days after transplanting.

 

 

Email

btpatilveg@rediffmail.com

Address

Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra 413 722
Integrated approach for controlling water hyacinth
I. Gnanavel and R.M. Kathiresan
Short communications | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-16 | Volume: 44 Page No:267-269 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

The experiment was conducted at Annamalai University, Tamilnadu, India to study the possibility of interaction between botanical herbicide Coleus amboinicus/aromaticus with insect agents Neochetina eichhorniae/bruchi. Single control options was found inefficient for managing the worlds worst aquatic weed water hyacinth. The integrated approach of releasing the insect agents Neochetina spp. onto the weed and spraying the aqueous extract of leaf powder of Coleus spp. showed synergistic interaction in reducing the fresh weight and chlorophyll content of water hyacinth. Among the three inoculation loads of insect agents,viz. three, two and one insects/plant, three/plant followed by spraying the extract of Coleus spp. leaf powder at 25% proved significantly superior in reducing the fresh weight and chlorophyll content to on 60 and 50 days after releasing the insects, respectively. Among the different interludes or time lag compared for evolving a standardized method of integrating foliar spray of leaf powder extract, viz. 10, 20 and 30 days, 10 days performed superior by achieving fresh weight and chlorophyll content reduction and least weed nutrient content of water hyacinth. No insect mortality was observed in any of the treatments.

Email

ignanavel@gmail.com

Address

Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu 608 002
Weed management for enhanced production of aerobic rice
P.S. John Daniel, R. Poonguzhalan, R. Mohan and E. Suburayalu
Short communications | DOI: IJWS-2012-44-4-17 | Volume: 44 Page No:270-273 |
Address & Email | Article preview | View PFD | Download

Abstract:

A field experiment was conducted at Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru College of Agriculture and Research Institute, Karaikal, Puducherry to evaluate the efficacy of different weed management practices in managing weeds of aerobic rice in the coastal areas of Karaikal. The     experiment involved eleven weed management treatments laid out in randomized block design with three replications. Treatments included: four pre-emergence (pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha, pretilachlor + safener 0.50 kg/ha, Butachlor 1.00 kg/ha and  anilophos 0.40 kg/ha) and three early post-emergence herbicides (cyhalofop 0.10 kg/ha, pyrazosulfuron ethyl 0.20 kg/ha, metamifop 0.075 kg/ha, metamifop 0.100 kg/ha) followed by one hand hoeing at 40 DAS. Aerobic rice under these treatments was compared with transplanted rice given two hand weeding at 20 and 40 days after transplanting. The predominant weed flora observed in the experimental field were Echinochloa colona, Cynodon dactylon, Panicum repens, Cyperus rotundus, Trianthema portulacastrum, Cleome viscosa, Aeschynomene indica and Eclipta alba. Herbicides tested were effective in reducing the weed density and biomass and increasing the rice grain yield significantly. Pre-emergence application of pendimethalin  0.75 kg/ha + HH at 40 DAS recorded significantly higher grain and straw yields with  lower weed density, weed biomass  and higher weed control efficiency.

Email

poonghuzhalan@yahoo.com

Address

Department of Agronomy, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru College of Agriculture and Research Institute, Karaikal, Puducherry 609 603

CONTACT Us

123 Main Street, St. NW Ste, 1 Washington, DC,USA.
  • business@support.com
  • +56 (0) 012 345 6789

Links

  • About Us
  • Services
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & condition

Latest Blog

Image

Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation

On 10 Feb, 2016
Image

Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation

On 10 Feb, 2016

NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Subscribe to Our Newsletter to get Important News, Amazing Offers & Inside Scoops:

© 2018 Garden HTML5 Template. All Rights Reserved.